Competitive ability of soybean cultivars with Ipomoea indivisa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712132022216Keywords:
substitutive experiments, Glycine max, morning glory, competitive interactionAbstract
Among the weeds that infest soybeans, the morning glory (Ipomoea indivisa) stands out for competing with water, light, nutrients and also interfering in the crop harvesting process. The aim of this study was to test the competitive ability of soybean cultivars in the presence of I. indivisa, in substitutive experiments. The experiments were carried out in a completely randomized design, with four replicates, using the soybean cultivars M 5838, DM 53i54, DM 57i52, DM 66i68, NS 5445, and NS 6601. A constant final yield for soybean and I. indivisa was observed with 24 plants per pot. Relative and total productivities were analyzed using diagrams applied to substitutive experiments with soybean and I. indivisa plants proportions of 24:0, 18:6, 12:12, 6:18, and 0:24 plants pot-1 (crop:weed). On 35 days after the emergence of the culture and the I. indivisa, the morphophysiological characteristics of the plants were assessed and the relative competitiveness indices were calculated considering the 50:50 plant ratio (12:12 plants pot-1). Morning glory affected the morphophysiological characteristics of soybean cultivars, demonstrating superior competitive ability for environmental resources. There was a competition between soybean cultivars and I. indivisa, which caused reductions in the shoot dry matter for both species. In this study, interspecific competition was more harmful than intraspecific competition.
Downloads
References
AGOSTINETTO D et al. 2013. Habilidade competitiva relativa de milhã em convivência com arroz irrigado e soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 48: 1315-1322.
ALMEIDA BC et al. 2018. Ambiente e densidade de semeadura em cultivares de soja para produção de biodiesel. Revista Campo Digital 13: 19-26.
BASTIANI MO et al. 2016 Relative competitiveness of soybean cultivars with barnyardgrass. Bragantia 75: 435-445.
BIANCHI MA et al. 2006a. Características de plantas de soja que conferem habilidade competitiva com plantas daninhas. Bragantia 65: 623-632.
BIANCHI MA et al. 2006b. Proporção entre plantas de soja e plantas competidoras e as relações de interferência mútua. Ciência Rural 36: 1380-1387.
CARVALHO SJP & CHRISTOFFOLETI PJ. 2008. Competition of Amaranthus species with dry bean plants. Scientia Agricola 65: 239-245.
CONAB. 2021. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Série Histórica das Safras. Available at: https: //www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/serie-historica-das-safras/item/download/39721_60249fb905b6c772e13be7d8602 709bd. Accessed on: Nov.20th. 2021.
COUSENS R. 1991. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition, interference. experiments. Weed Technology 5: 664-673.
COUSENS R & O'NEILL M. 1993. Density dependence of replacement series experiments. Oikos 66: 347-352.
CRAINE JM & DYBZINSKI R. 2013. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients, water and light. Functional Ecology 27: 833-840.
DALAZEN G et al. 2017. Faunistic analysis of pest insects and their natural enemies associated with hairy fleabane in soybean crop. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 47: 336-344.
DATTA A et al. 2017. Managing weeds using crop competition in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Crop Protection 95: 60¬-68.
DIESEL F et al. 2020. Interference of broadleaf buttonweed and white-eye in soybean. Planta Daninha 38: e020186466.
DUSABUMUREMYI P et al. 2014 Narrow row planting increases yield and suppresses weeds in common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. in a semi-arid agro-ecology of Nyagatare, Rwanda. Crop Protection 64: 13-18.
EMBRAPA. 2013. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Brasília: Embrapa Solos. 154p.
FERREIRA EA et al. 2015. Aspectos fisiológicos de soja transgênica submetida à competição com plantas daninhas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 58: 115-121.
FLECK NG et al. 2008. Relative competitivity among flooded rice cultivars and a red rice biotype. Planta Daninha 26: 101-111.
FORTE CT et al. 2017. Habilidade competitiva de cultivares de soja transgênica convivendo com plantas daninhas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 12: 185-193.
FRANDOLOSO F et al. 2019. Competition of maize hybrids with alexandergrass (Urochloa plantaginea). Australian Journal of Crop Science 13: 1447¬¬-1455.
FREITAS FILHO AM. 2014. Fungicidas de efeitos fisiológicos no desenvolvimento de plantas de pimentão enxertadas e não enxertadas sob cultivo protegido. Doctoral Thesis. Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”: UNESP. 54p.
GABARDO G et al. 2020. Respostas fisiológicas das cultivares de soja NA5909 e TMG7062 submetidas a diferentes produtos para controle de doenças fúngicas em campo. Brazilian Journal of Development 6: 15673-15689.
GALON L et al. 2015. Comparison of experimental methods to assess the competitive ability of weed species. American Journal of Plant Sciences 6: 2185-2196.
GALON L et al. 2019. Competitive interaction and economic injury level of Urochloa plantaginea in corn hybrids. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 86: e0182019.
HAMMER DJ et al. 2018. Has Breeding Improved Soybean Competitiveness with Weeds? Weed Science 66: 57-61.
HIDAYAT T et al. 2021. The effectiveness of reflective mulch in the intercropping system between soybean and oil palm: effects on growth, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic characteristics. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 77: 128-138.
HOFFMAN ML & BUHLER DD. 2002. Utilizing Sorghum as a functional model of crop–weed competition. I. Establishing a competitive hierarchy. Weed Science 50: 466-472.
IQBAL N et al. 2019. Drought tolerance of soybean, Glycine max L. Merr. by improved photosynthetic characteristics and an efficient antioxidant enzyme activities under a split-root system. Frontiers Physiology 10: 786.
JHA P et al. 2017. Weed management using crop competition in the United States: A review. Crop Protection 95: 31-37.
KOEHLER-COLE K et al. 2021. Spring-planted cover crops for weed control in soybean. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 36: 501-508.
KONZEN A et al. 2021. Competitive interaction between soybean cultivars and Sida rhombifolia. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 16: e8975.
LUCIO FR et al. 2019. Dispersal and frequency of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-tolerant weeds in soybean-producing edaphoclimatic microregions in Brazil. Weed Technology 33: 217-231.
MANGENA P. 2018. Water stress: morphological and anatomical changes in soybean, Glycine max L. plants. In: ANDJELKOVIC V. Ed. Plant, Abiotic Stress and Responses to Climate Change. London: IntechOpen Limited. p.9-31.
NAGASUGA K. 2019. Soybean seed production and canopy photosynthesis in cultivation. In: KASAI M. (Ed.). Soybean - Biomass, Yield and Productivity. London: IntechOpen Limited. p.1-18.
PIAZENTINE AE. 2021. Períodos de interferência do capim-amargoso na cultura da soja e do milho. Master Dissertation. São Paulo: UNESP. 50p.
PICCININI F. 2015. Competitividade e danos de cordas-de-viola em soja. Master Dissertation. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria: UFSM. 43p.
PICCININI F et al. 2018. Interference of morning glory in soybean yield. Planta Daninha 36: e018150988.
RIZZARDI MA et al. 2003. Perdas de rendimento de grãos de soja causadas por interferência de picão-preto e guanxuma. Ciência Rural 33: 621-627.
RIZZARDI MA et al. 2016. Competitive analysis of soybean and sudangrass using replacement series design. Revista Ceres 63: 668-675.
SBCS. 2016. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. Manual de adubação e calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. 11.ed. Porto Alegre: SBCS, Núcleo Regional Sul. 376p.
RUBIN RS et al. 2014. Habilidade competitiva relativa de arroz irrigado com arroz-vermelho suscetível ou resistente ao herbicida imazapyr + imazapic. Arquivo do Instituto Biológico 81: 173-179.
SANTOS JB & CURY JP. 2011. Picão-preto: uma planta daninha especial em solos tropicais. Planta Daninha 29: 1159-1171.
SHELDON K et al. 2021. Allelopathic impact of cover crop species on soybean and goosegrass seedling germination and early growth. Agriculture 11: 965.
SOUZA RG et al. 2019. Desempenho Agronômico de soja, sob interferência de plantas infestantes. Revista Cultura Agronônica 28: 194-203.
TREZZI MM et al. 2013. Competitive ability of soybean cultivars with horseweed (Conyza bonariensis). Planta Daninha 31: 543-550.
ULGUIM AR et al. 2017. Does competition between soybeans and wild poinsettia with low-level resistance or susceptibility to glyphosate affect physiology and secondary metabolism? Semina 38: 1133-1144.
VILÀ M et al. 2004. Competition experiments on alien weeds with crops: lessons for measuring plant invasion impact? Biological Invasions 6: 59-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors & Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.
