Interference and economic damage level of alexandergrass in beans as a function of plant density
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712132022263Keywords:
Phaseolus vulgaris, Urochloa plantaginea, competitive interactionAbstract
The study of bean sowing density and the level of economic damage (EDL) caused by alexandergrass (Urochloa plantaginea) are important tools for adequately adopting the integrated management of this weed and, thus, producing food with higher quality and less pesticide residue. Therefore, the objective of this work was to evaluate the interference and the level of the economic damage of alexandergrass in competition with the common bean, estimated as a function of sowing densities of the crop and the weed. The bean cultivar IPR Uirapuru was used. The treatments consisted of four bean densities (140,000; 180,000; 220,000 and 260,000 plants ha-1, respectively) and alexandergrass that varied from 0 to the maximum of 104 plants m-2. The experiment was installed in a Red Aluminoferric Latosol, at the experimental area of the Federal University of the Southern Border, campus Erechim/RS, on 10/31/2016. We used the rectangular hyperbola model to describe the relationship between the loss of bean grain yield and the explanatory variables of plant density (DP), soil cover (CS), leaf area (AF) and shoot dry matter (MS). Therefore, the variables CS and DP can be used instead of AF and MS to estimate grain yield losses in common beans. The density of 260,000 plants ha-1 of bean showed greater competitiveness with alexandergrass and the highest values of EDLs, justifying the adoption of weed control management at higher densities.
Downloads
References
BALBINOT JUNIOR AA et al. 2018. Phenotypic plasticity in a soybean cultivar with indeterminate growth type. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 52: 1038-1044.
BEZERRA AAC et al. 2014. Morfofisiologia e produção de feijão-caupi, cultivar BRS Novaera, em função da densidade de plantas. Revista Caatinga 27: 135-141.
BRANDLER D et al. 2021. Interference and level of economic damage of turnip in canola. Revista Agraria Academica 4: 39-56.
CARGNELUTTI FILHO A & STORCK L. 2007. Estatísticas de avaliação da precisão experimental em ensaios de cultivares de milho. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 42: 17-24.
CONAB. 2022. Séries Históricas: feijão. Disponível em: <http://www.conab.gov.br>. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2022.
CQFS-RS/SC. 2016. Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo. Manual de adubação e calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. 11.ed. Porto Alegre: SBCS. 376p.
COUSENS R. 1985. An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. Journal of Agricultural Science 105: 513-521.
DUSABUMUREMYI P et al. 2014. Narrow row planting increases yield and suppresses weeds in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a semi-arid agro-ecology of Nyagatare, Rwanda. Crop Protection 64: 13-18.
FRANCESCHETTI MB et al. 2019. Interference of Urochloa plantaginea on morphophysiology and yield components of black beans. Journal of Agricultural Science 11: 272-280.
FONTES JRA. 2015. Capacidade competitiva de cultivares de feijão-caupi de porte semiereto e controle cultural de plantas daninhas. Circular Técnica da Embrapa 51: 1-6. Disponível em: <https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/bitstream>. Acesso em: 19 jan. 2022.
GALON L et al. 2016. Interference and economic threshold level for control of beggartick on bean cultivars. Planta Daninha 34: 411-422.
GALON L et al. 2018. Competitive interaction between sweet sorghum with weeds. Planta Daninha 36: e018173689.
KALSING A & VIDAL RA. 2013. Nível crítico de dano de papuã em feijão-comum. Planta Daninha 31: 843-850.
LEQUIA KD et al. 2021. Pinto bean response to seeding rate and herbicides. Weed Technology 35: 628-631.
LINDQUIST JL & KROPFF MJ. 1996. Application of an ecophysiological model for irrigated rice (Oryza sativa) - Echinochloa competition. Weed Science 44: 52-56.
MANABE PMS et al. 2015. Efeito da competição de plantas daninhas na cultura do feijoeiro. Bioscience Journal 31: 333-343.
MENDES RMS et al. 2005. Alterações na relação fonte-dreno em feijão-de-corda submetido a diferentes densidades de plantas. Ciência Agronômica 36: 82-90.
PARADISO R & PROIETTI S. 2021. Light-quality manipulation to control plant growth and photomorphogenesis in greenhouse horticulture: the state of the art and the opportunities of modern led systems. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 41: 742-78.
PARREIRA MC et al. 2014. Comparação entre métodos para determinar o período anterior à interferência de plantas daninhas em feijoeiros com distintos tipos de hábitos de crescimento. Planta Daninha 32: 727-738.
SANTOS HG et al. 2018. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5.ed. Brasília: Embrapa. 356p.
SBCPD. 1995. Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas. Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas. Londrina: SBCPD. 42p.
SORATTO RP et al. 2017. Densidade de plantas e adubação nitrogenada na nutrição e produtividade de cultivares de feijão. Revista Caatinga 30: 670-678.
SWINTON SM et al. 1994. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Science 42: 103-109.
TAVARES CJ et al. 2013. Fitossociologia de plantas daninhas na cultura do feijão. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 8: 27-32.
TEDESCO MJ et al. 1995. Análises de solo, plantas e outros materiais. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: UFRGS. 174p. (Boletim Técnico 5).
VIDAL R et al. 2010. Interferência e nível de dano econômico de Brachiaria plantaginea e Ipomoea nil na cultura do feijão comum. Ciência Rural 40: 1675-1681.
VIECELLI M et al. 2021. Morphophysiological characteristics of Brazilian bean genotypes related with sulfentrazone tolerance. Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes 56: 706-721.
WU Y et al. 2021. Differences in weed suppression between two modern and two old wheat cultivars at different sowing densities. Agronomy 11: 253.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors & Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.