The performance of the innovation platform for the development of the dairy chain at the regional level in Colombia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712232023475

Keywords:

Agro industrial chain, capacity, evaluation, systemic problem

Abstract

Innovation platforms (IP) have become a recognized approach to analyze agricultural and agro-industrial value chains, since they allow the interpretation of broad factors that complement aspects of production, such as innovation capacities and systemic problems.  However, one of the important challenges of IP is also its analysis at various geographical scales. Therefore the goal is analyze innovation platform IP for the development of dairy activity performance at the regional level, in order to reveal restrictions, challenges and opportunities towards a greater understanding and strengthening the dairy chain in Colombia. Information was collected through a web survey to stakeholders, reaching the response of 40 of them. However, for actors mapping, two interviews were previously conducted with key actors in the region. Additionally, a complementary secondary information review was carried out. It was found that the institutional relationship as a systemic problem mainly limits the performance of the individual, organizational and political capacities of the actors. On the other hand, the local actors presence and regulations limit projection and network capacities, respectively. In turn, there are some differences between the self-assessment of capacities and the external assessment of an actor towards others, which may have implications for perceived legitimacy for certain institutional arrangements and governance of relationships. Finally the integrated framework of performance analysis of the IP for the development of the dairy chain at the regional level, reveals differences in the evaluation of the capacities of the actors, as well as the existence of systemic problems that limit the capacities of the actors in the individual, organization, projection, network and political levels

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AHIMBISIBWE BP et al. 2020. Household welfare impacts of an agricultural innovation platform in Uganda. Food and Energy Security 9: e225.

AUDOUIN S et al. 2018. Territory matters: Exploring the functioning of an innovation system through the filter of local territorial practices - the example of the adoption of cashew trees in Burkina Faso. Journal of Rural Studies 63: 130–140.

BURKART et al. 2020. COVID-19 and the bovine livestock sector in Colombia: Current and potential developments, impacts and mitigation options. Cali: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).

DEHÁQUIZ et al. 2012. Environmental management model for small dairies in the Industrial Corridor of Boyaca (Colombia). Agronomía Colombiana 30: 141–148.

DELGADO-SERRANO MDM et al. 2016. Adapting prospective structural analysis to strengthen sustainable management and capacity building in community-based natural resource management contexts. Ecology and Society 21: 36.

HALL A et al. 2006. Concepts and guidelines for diagnostic assessments of agricultural innovation capacity. MERIT Working Papers 017.

HERMANS F et al. 2019. Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 88: 76–95.

HERMANS F et al. 2015. Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: Using an innovation system performance lens to analyse agricultural knowledge systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 21: 35–54.

HERMANS F et al. 2017. Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. PloS One 12.

KILELU C et al. 2013. Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems 118: 65–77.

KLERKX L & LEEUWIS C. 2008. Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries. Food Policy 33: 260–276.

KLERKX L et al. 2012. Advances in knowledge brokering in the agricultural sector: Towards innovation system facilitation. IDS Bulletin 43: 53–60.

LEEUWIS C et al. 2014. Capacity to innovate from a system CGIAR research program perspective. Penang: CGIAR. 12p.

LEMA Z et al. 2021. Multilevel innovation platforms for development of smallholder livestock systems: How effective are they? Agricultural Systems 189: 103047.

MADR. 2017. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. 2017. Implementación política para mejorar la competitividad el sector lácteo nacional. Bogotá: MADR. 110p.

MATEUS R & DÍAZ C. 2021. Proposal for an Innovation Ecosystem for the Dairy Chain in Latin America. Revista Científica Pensamiento y Gestión: 10–45.

MEJÍA YED. 2012. Diagnostico situacional y ambiental de la cadena láctea del departamento de Boyacá. In Vestigium Ire 5: 37–46.

MENARD C. 2018. Research frontiers of new institutional economics. Rausp Management Journal 53: 3-10.

MINH TT. 2019. Unpacking the systemic problems and blocking mechanisms of a regional agricultural innovation system: An integrated regional-functional-structural analysis. Agricultural Systems 173: 268–280.

MINSALUD. 2020. Análisis de Impacto Normativo Productos Lácteos. Bogotá: MINSALUD.

MOJICA FJ et al. 2007. Agenda Prospectiva de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico de la Cadena Láctea Colombiana. Bogotá: MADR. 168p.

MOLANO-BERNAL LC et al. 2021. Diagnóstico de la producción primaria en fincas lecheras del proyecto cadena de valor láctea en Boyacá y Nariño, Colombia. Revista de Investigación e Innovación Agropecuaria y de Recursos Naturales 8: 54–61.

PINEDA L & PINEDA M. 2020. Cambio en las estructuras de significación en organizaciones de pequeños productores. Una comprensión desde la teoría institucional. Encuentros 18: 119-128.

PINEDA LS. 2014. Comportamiento del sector lechero en el departamento de Boyacá: una aproximación desde la metáfora biológica. Punto de Vista 7: 149–167.

RAMÍREZ-GÓMEZ CJ & RODRÍGUEZ-ESPINOSA H. 2021. Local public-private partnerships to promote innovation in agricultural value chains: the case of cocoa in Colombia. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 60: 1–18.

RAMÍREZ-GÓMEZ CJ et al. 2020. Trust networks and innovation dynamics of small farmers in Colombia: An approach from territorial system of agricultural innovation. Revista de La Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo 2: 253–266.

RAMÍREZ-GÓMEZ CJ et al. 2022. The coffee value chain and its transition to sustainability in Brazil and Colombia from innovation system approach. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 20: 1150–1165.

SCHUT M et al. 2015. Innovation Platforms: Experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Experimental Agriculture 52: 537-561.

SIMANCA M et al. 2016. Gestión del conocimiento en cadenas productivas: El caso de la cadena láctea en Colombia. Información Tecnológica 27: 93–106.

SPARROW AD & TRAORÉ A. 2018. Limits to the applicability of the innovation platform approach for agricultural development in West Africa: Socio-economic factors constrain stakeholder engagement and confidence. Agricultural Systems 165: 335-343.

SWAANS K et al. 2013. A monitoring and evaluation framework to assess the performance of innovation platforms in the context of livestock value chains. In: ILRI Discussion Paper 24. Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute.

TOTIN E et al. 2020. Scaling practices within agricultural innovation platforms: Between pushing and pulling. Agricultural Systems 179: 102764.

TURNER J et al. 2015. Unpacking systemic capacity to innovate: How projects coordinate capabilities across agricultural innovation system levels. Paris: INRA ImpAR Conference.

TURNER J et al. 2016. Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 76: 99–112.

TURNER J et al. 2017. Unpacking systemic innovation capacity as strategic ambidexterity: How projects dynamically configure capabilities for agricultural innovation. Land Use Policy 68: 503–523.

UPRA. 2021a. Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria. Plan de Acción para la Cadena Láctea Bovina en Colombia. Bogotá: UPRA.

UPRA. 2021b. Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria. Plan de Ordenamiento Productivo: Análisis situacional de la cadena láctea en Colombia. Bogotá: UPRA

UZZI B. 1997. Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35-67.

VAN PAASSEN A et al. 2014. Agricultural innovation platforms in West Africa: How does strategic institutional entrepreneurship unfold in different value chain contexts? Outlook on Agriculture 43: 193–200.

WANG Y & QI G. 2022. Sustainable Knowledge Contribution in Open Innovation Platforms: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective on Network Effects. Sustainability 14: 6536.

WEYORI AE et al. 2017. Agricultural innovation systems and farm technology adoption: findings from a study of the Ghanaian plantain sector. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 24: 65–87.

WIECZOREK AJ & HEKKERT MP. 2012. Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy 39: 74–87.

YIN RK. 1994. Case study research: design and methods. 2.ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Published

2023-08-04

How to Cite

GÓMEZ, Carlos Julián Ramírez; PELEGRINA, Juliano. The performance of the innovation platform for the development of the dairy chain at the regional level in Colombia. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 22, n. 3, p. 475–483, 2023. DOI: 10.5965/223811712232023475. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/23275. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Animals and Derived Products

Most read articles by the same author(s)