Rereading Sophie Calle and Jean-Paul Thenot: on the difficulties of describing an art work

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/2175234612262020184

Keywords:

artwork description, contemporary art audience, relationship between image and word, Sophie Calle, Jean-Paul Thenot

Abstract

Sophie Calle, in Purloined, exhibited absent works through descriptions made by museum employees; Jean-Paul Thenot, in Cent lectures de Marcel Duchamp, asked a hundred people what Duchamp’s works evoked in them. In order to capture the public’s perception of art in Porto Alegre, I reproduced the exercises of Calle and Thenot (with adaptations), having as object three works of the Ío duo of artists exhibited in 2018 at Santander Cultural. I applied questionnaires to one hundred visitors of the institution, asking them to describe each of the works in a word. I also conducted oral interviews with Santander Cultural employees, who were invited to describe the works. Content analysis of the collected data indicates that most answers do not correspond to the epistemological definition of “description”. This article proposes explanations for this result, such as the difficulties of the relation between image and word or the influence of traditional theories on the interpretation of art.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juliana Proenço de Oliveira, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Mestranda em Artes Visuais, com ênfase em História, Teoria e Crítica de Arte pela UFRGS. Possui graduação em Direito (2014) e em História da Arte (2018) ambas também pela UFRGS.

References

ALPERS, Svetlana. A arte de descrever: a arte holandesa no século XVII. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, 1999.

ARCHER, Michael. Arte contemporânea: uma história concisa. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.

BARDIN, Lawrence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.

BARRETT, Terry. A crítica de arte: como entender o contemporâneo. 3 ed. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 2014.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. As regras da arte. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1996.

CANCLINI, Nestor García. A sociedade sem relato: antropologia e estética da iminência. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, 2016.

COLI, Jorge. O que é arte. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2013.

D’ALLEVA, Anne. How to write art history. 2 ed. Londres: Laurence King Publishing Ltda., 2010.

DANTO, Arthur. A transfiguração do lugar-comum: uma filosofia da arte. São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2005.

DERRIDA, Jacques. La vérité en peinture. Paris: Flammarion, 1978.

DIDI-HUBERMAN, Georges. O que vemos, o que nos olha. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2010.

MATTHEWS, Robert J. Describing and interpreting a work of art. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 36, n. 1, autumn 1977, p. 5-14. Disponível em: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/430744?read-now=1&refreqid=excelsior%3Acc6986c9da5d11582b e33e3b1136c2cc&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>. Acesso 01 dez. 2018.

PERROTIN. Sophie Calle | Purloined: Turner, 1998-2013. Disponível em: . Acesso 27 mai. 2019.

SONTAG, Susan. Contra a interpretação. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 1987.

THENOT, Jean-Paul. Site oficial do artista. Disponível em: <http://www.jeanpaulthenot.fr>. Acesso 31 out. 2018.

Published

2020-01-01

How to Cite

OLIVEIRA, Juliana Proenço de. Rereading Sophie Calle and Jean-Paul Thenot: on the difficulties of describing an art work. Palíndromo, Florianópolis, v. 12, n. 26, p. 184–207, 2020. DOI: 10.5965/2175234612262020184. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/palindromo/article/view/15391. Acesso em: 21 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos Seção aberta