Eficiência da cultura do milho para aumentar a autossuficiência alimentar na Indonésia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712342024616Palavras-chave:
avaliação de desempenho , eficiência do cultivo de milho, autossuficiência alimentar, fator de produção, análise de fronteira estocásticaResumo
O cultivo de milho é fundamental para alcançar a autossuficiência alimentar nacional na província de Java Central, pois contribui para mudanças estruturais na economia. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a eficiência e analisar os fatores de produção do cultivo de milho. A análise implementou o modelo Stochastic Frontier (SFA) para avaliar a eficiência e os fatores de produção. Os resultados revelam que os agricultores têm um nível de eficiência técnica de 77%, eficiência alocativa de 63% e eficiência econômica de 56%. Para aumentar a eficiência, os agricultores são incentivados a otimizar os insumos agrícolas do milho. Em especial, os fatores de produção de área de terra, sementes, fertilizantes de ureia, fertilizantes NPK, fertilizantes KCI, pesticidas e mão de obra apresentam efeitos positivos. A avaliação da escala de negócios indica retornos crescentes à escala, destacando o impacto positivo da adição de fatores de produção na produção de milho. No entanto, negligenciar os fatores de produção pode levar a insumos adicionais e reduzir a produtividade das culturas. A otimização do uso de insumos pode levar ao aumento da escala de produção no cultivo de milho, à melhoria da eficiência e à autossuficiência alimentar nacional. Esta pesquisa pode fornecer informações valiosas para que os agricultores aumentem a eficiência por meio do uso eficaz de insumos. Além disso, as descobertas são fundamentais para o desenvolvimento de planos agrícolas pelo governo com o objetivo de promover a agricultura e implementar políticas para aumentar a eficiência e alcançar a autossuficiência alimentar.
Downloads
Referências
ALQAISI O et al. 2019. Optimal dairy feed input selection under alternative feeds availability and relative prices. Information Processing in Agriculture 6: 438–453.
BECKER F et al. 2023. Impact of essential oils on methane emissions, milk yield, and feed efficiency and resulting influence on the carbon footprint of dairy production systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30: 48824–48836.
BERK A et al. 2022. Measurement of resource use efficiency in corn production: A two-stage data envelopment analysis approach in Turkey. Ciencia Rural 52: e20210022.
BPS 2023. Statistics of Indonesia. Indonesian in Figure 2021. Jakarta.
DRASTIG K et al. 2016. Farm water productivity in broiler production: case studies in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 135: 9–19.
FAN Y et al. 2018. Multi-crop production decisions and economic irrigationwater use efficiency: The effects ofwater costs, pressure irrigation adoption, and climatic determinants. Water 10:1637.
FAO. 2022. FAO statistical pocketbook. Rome: FAO
GEFFERSA AG et al. 2019. Technology adoption and technical efficiency in maize production in rural Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 14: 184–201.
GISLON G et al. 2020. Forage systems and sustainability of milk production: Feed efficiency, environmental impacts and soil carbon stocks. Journal of Cleaner Production. 260: 121012.
HETMANENKO V et al. 2021. Technological, agronomical and economic efficiency of new organic and organo-mineral soil amendments. E3S Web of Conferences 280: 1–7.
HRYHORIV Y et al. 2022. Economic efficiency of sweet corn growing with nutrition optimization. Agraarteadus 33: 81–87.
HUFFMAN WE et al. 2018. The economic impacts of technology and climate change: New evidence from U.S. corn yields. Agricultural Economics 49: 463–479.
ILHAM N et al. 2021. Production Efficiency of Poultry Small-Scale Laying Hen in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Dan Veteriner 26: 187–194.
ILSAN M & HASAN I. 2022. Potential and realized of farmer household labor to support optimal performance of corn and rice farming in South Sulawesi Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 20: 8–14.
JAHANGIRPOUR D & ZIBAEI M. 2023. Farmers’ Preferences in Adopting Conservation Tillage Systems Considering Risk Attitudes in Bakhtegan Basin. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 25: 1309–1322.
LI Z et al. 2022. Assessing the impacts of pre-growing-season weather conditions on soil nitrogen dynamics and corn productivity in the U.S. Midwest. Field Crops Research 284: 108563.
LOHOSHA R et al. 2023. Economic efficiency of using digestate from biogas plants in Ukraine when growing agricultural crops as a way of achieving the goals of the European Green Deal. Polityka Energetyczna 26: 161–182.
LOHOSHA R et al. 2024. An advanced European overview of the bioenergy efficiency of using digestate from biogas plants when growing agricultural crops. Polityka Energetyczna 27: 5–25.
MISHRA AK et al. 2022. Technology and managerial gaps in contract farming: the case of specialty crop production. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47: 77–96.
PREZA-FONTES G et al. 2021. Development of an online tool for tracking soil nitrogen to improve the environmental performance of maize production. Sustainability 13: 5649.
PRIYANTO D et al. 2023. Analyzing technical and economic performance for developing corn-based sheep farming in rural indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 18: 3935–3945.
RAHAYU HSP et al. 2021. Analysis of marketing margins and farmers’ shares on corn in sigi regency, central sulawesi, indonesia. Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36: 355.
RAHAYU S et al. 2019. Stakeholder role in improving agribusiness efficiency and food security in developing countries. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration 7: 464–470.
RIYANTO D et al. 2021. Application of rice-corn intercropping as an optimization of the land use utilization and increasing of farmer income in playen, gunungkidul. E3S Web of Conferences 23: 1–10.
SANTA NM et al. 2021. The efficiency of pig farming inputs in Minahasa Regency of North Sulawesi. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture 46: 84–90.
SCHÖNLEBEN M et al. 2020. Towards smart dairy nutrition: Improving sustainability and economics of dairy production. Czech Journal of Animal Science 65: 153–161.
SIAGIAN V et al. 2021. Analysis of factors that influence production and cost of corn in Banten province. E3S Web of Conferences 232: 1–9.
WANG J & HU X. 2021. Research on corn production efficiency and influencing factors of typical farms: Based on data from 12 corn-producing countries from 2012 to 2019. PLoS ONE 16.
WANG X et al. 2023. Feeding whole-plant ensiled corn stover affects growth performance, blood parameters, and Cecal microbiota of Holdobagy goose. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10.
XU B et al. 2021. Research on the whole process mechanized agricultural machinery allocation of wheat and corn based on economic benefits. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization 42: 222–227.
ZHANG M et al. 2018. Empirical study on the sustainability of China’s grain quality improvement: The role of transportation, labor, and agricultural machinery. International journal of environmental research and public health 15: 271.
ZHANG W & QIN Q. 2019. Decoupling analysis on water resources utilization of planting industry and economic development in Shaanxi Province from the perspective of water footprint. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 27: 153–162.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Autores e Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os autores que publicam nesta revista estão de acordo com os seguintes termos:
a) Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista os direitos autorais da primeira publicação, de acordo com a Creative Commons Attribution Licence. Todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição BY.
b) Autores têm autoridade para assumir contratos adicionais com o conteúdo do manuscrito.
c) Os autores podem fornecer e distribuir o manuscrito publicado por esta revista.
