Genetic divergence between coffee genotypes resistant to rust based on anatomical features

Authors

  • Mariana Thereza Rodrigues Viana Federal University of Lavras
  • Tamara Cubiaki Pires da Gama Federal University of Lavras
  • Janine Magalhães Guedes Federal University of Lavras
  • Rubens José Guimarães Federal University of Lavras
  • Harianna Paula Alves de Azevedo Federal University of Lavras
  • Dalyse Toledo Castanheira Federal University of Lavras
  • Vicente Luiz Naves Federal University of Lavras

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711732018547

Keywords:

coffea arabica, germplasm bank, improvement, leaf anatomy., leaf anatomy

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the genetic divergence of coffee genotypes resistant to rust, of the Germplasm Bank from Minas Gerais, based on anatomical features. A total of 12 foliar anatomical characteristics were assessed, and Mahalanobis distance was used to quantify the genetic divergence between genotypes. The Tocher method and the hierarchical method of UPGMA (Unweighted Pair-Group Method Using Arithmetic Averages) were used as group strategy. Moreover, relative contribution analyses of the variables were made. There was genetic variability between genotypes, and the analysis of Tocher and UPGMA grouping separated the genotypes into five and seven distinct groups, respectively. The MG 0582 genotype stood out as the most divergent based on the evaluated anatomical features. There is great genetic variability for the characteristics of foliar anatomy among the 15 genotypes evaluated, allowing to select superior genotypes based on these characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANTHONY F et al. 2002. The origin of cultivated Coffea arabica L.: varieties revealed by AFLP and SSR markers. Theoretical Applied Genetics 104: 894-900.

AZEVEDO AM et al. 2013. Seleção de genótipos de alface para cultivo protegido: divergência genética e importância de caracteres. Horticultura Brasileira 31: 260-265.

BALIZA DP et al. 2012. Trocas gasosas e características estruturais adaptativas de cafeeiros cultivados em diferentes níveis de radiação. Coffee Science 7: 250-258.

BARRETO LF et al. 2015. Characterization of rambutan plants by foliar aspects. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 3607-3613.

CASTANHEIRA DT et al. 2016. Potencial de utilização de características anatômicas e fisiológicas na seleção de progênies de cafeeiro. Coffee Science 11: 374-385.

CRUZ CD. 2013. GENES: software para análise de dados em estatística experimental e em genética quantitativa. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 35: 271-276.

DEL GROSSI L et al. 2013. Rust resistance in Arabic Coffee cultivars in northern Paraná. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 56: 27-33.

EIRA MTS et al. 2007. Bancos de germoplasma de café no Brasil. Brasília: EMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. 18p. (Documentos 243).

FONSECA AFA et al. 2006. Divergência genética em café conilon. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41: 599-605.

GOMES IAC et al. 2008. Alterações morfofisiológicas em folhas de Coffea arabica L. cv. ”Oeiras” sob influência do sombreamento por Acacia mangium Willd. Ciência Rural 38: 109-115.

GUEDES JM et al. 2013a. Genetic divergence among progenies resulting from the crossing of groups coffee Hybrid Timor and Dilla & Alghe. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 3: 865-872.

GUEDES JM et al. 2013b. Divergência genética do germoplasma Maragogipe. Bragantia 72: 127-132.

IVOGLO MG et al. 2008. Divergência genética entre progênies de café robusta. Bragantia 67: 823-831.

JOHANSEN DA. 1940. Plant microtechnique. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. 487p.

KÖPPEN W. 1948. Climatologia: con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. México: Fondo de Cultura Econômica. 478p.

KRAUS JE & ARDUIM M. 1997. Manual básico de métodos em morfologia vegetal. Rio de Janeiro: Seropédica. 198p.

LOURENÇO HAO et al. 2011. Anatomia foliar de diferentes cultivares de soja e sua relação com a incidência e severidade de doenças. Global Science and Technology 4: 37-47.

MUSSURY RM et al. 2012. Anatomia foliar de soja infectada por Phakopsora pachyrhizi H. Sydow & Sydow e tratadas com extratos vegetais. Revista Brasileira De Plantas Medicinais 14: 18-25.

OLIVEIRA NK et al. 2014. Anatomia foliar de cafeeiros implantados com o uso de polímero hidrorretentor. Coffee Science 9: 258-265.

QUEIROZ-VOLTAN RB et al. 2014. Caracterização da anatomia foliar de cafeeiros arábica em diferentes períodos sazonais. Revista Biotemas 27: 1-10.

RIBEIRO MNO et al. 2012. Anatomia foliar de mandioca em função do potencial para tolerância às diferentes condições ambientais. Revista Ciência Agronômica 43: 354-361.

SILVA LM et al. 2005. Inter-relações entre anatomia vegetal e produção vegetal. Acta Botânica Brasílica 19: 183-194.

SINGH D. 1981. The relative importance of characters affecting genetic divergence. The Indian Journal of Genetic and Plant Breeding 41: 237-245.

VÁRZEA VMP et al. 2002. Resistência do cafeeiro a Hemileia vastatrix. In: ZAMBOLIM. L (Ed.). O estado da arte de tecnologias na produção de café. Viçosa: UFV. p.297-303.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-14

How to Cite

VIANA, Mariana Thereza Rodrigues; GAMA, Tamara Cubiaki Pires da; GUEDES, Janine Magalhães; GUIMARÃES, Rubens José; AZEVEDO, Harianna Paula Alves de; CASTANHEIRA, Dalyse Toledo; NAVES, Vicente Luiz. Genetic divergence between coffee genotypes resistant to rust based on anatomical features. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 17, n. 4, p. 547–555, 2018. DOI: 10.5965/223811711732018547. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/10481. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 4 (2018)

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:

a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.

c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.