Different housing densities of laying hens in cages and their production, egg quality and feather score





animal welfare, feather pecking, environmental conditions, comfort, stress


The well-being of laying hens raised in cages is affected due to the smaller space available for them, which is in line with the growing pressure from a large number of consumers concerned about the conditions in which these birds are raised.The consequence of this lower housing density on productivity and the quality of life of the bird and the eggs produced by them must be evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the production, egg quality, and welfare of laying hens reared in different housing densities in cages. At 28 weeks of age, 120 light Novogen White laying hens were distributed, after beak trimming, in 24 cages measuring 45 cm x 50 cm, in three different housing densities: 562.5 cm²/bird (four birds/cage), 450 cm²/bird (five birds/cage) and 375 cm²/bird (six birds/cage), with 8 repetitions each. The experimental diets were isoproteic and isoenergetic, based on corn and soybean meal. The trial period will comprise six cycles of 28 days each. The variables analyzed were: egg weight, yolk index, Haugh unit, yolk pigmentation, percentage of egg components and shell thickness (in millimeters). When the birds reached 44 weeks of age, the feather score was measured. Forty chickens per treatment were evaluated in four regions: chest, back, wings and hindquarters. This analysis consists of categorizing the birds according to three different scores, according to the size of the area without feathers in each region. It is expected that the reduction in the hen housing density in the cages will lead to higher production with better egg quality, also promoting better hen welfare.


Download data is not yet available.


ANDERSON KE et al. 2004. Effects of bird age, density, and molt on behavioral profiles of two commercial layer strains in cages. Poultry science 83(1): 15-23.

BENYI K et al. 2006. Effects of stocking density and group size on the performance of white and brown Hyline layers in semi-arid conditions. Tropical animal health and production 38: 619-24.

CABRELON MA. 2016. Diferentes densidades de gaiola e suas implicações no comportamento de galinhas poedeiras e na qualidade dos ovos produzidos. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia de Sistemas Agrícolas) - Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.

CASTILHO VAR.et al. 2015. Bem-estar de galinhas poedeiras em diferentes densidades de alojamento. Brazilian Journal Of Biosystems Engineering, [S.l.] p.122-131

CEC. 1999. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Council Diretive 1999/74/EC of 19 July/1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. [S.l.]: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. n.6. 8p.

DECINA C et al. 2019. Development of a scoring system to assess feather damage in Canadian laying hen flocks. Animals 9: 436.

EL‐TARABANY MS. 2016. Impact of cage stocking density on egg laying characteristics and related stress and immunity parameters of Japanese quails in subtropics. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition 100: 893-901.

HAUGH RR. 1937. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. United States. Egg Poultry Magazine, Chicago 43: 552-555.

HEMSWORTH PH et. 2020. Natural behaviours, their drivers and their implications for laying hen welfare. Animal Production Science 61: 915-930.

HY-LINE. 2019. Guia de Manejo. Hy-Line International. Disponível em: www.hyline.com. Acesso: 08 Mai .2023.

JAHANIAN R & MIRFENDERESKI E. 2015. Effect of high stocking density on performance, egg quality, and plasma and yolk antioxidant capacity in laying hens supplemented with organic chromium and vitamin C. Livestock Science 177: 117-124.

KANG HK et al. 2018. Effect of stocking density on laying performance, egg quality and blood parameters of Hy-Line Brown laying hens in an aviary system Eur. Poult. Sci., 82

KHUMPUT S et al. 2019. Feather pecking of laying hens in different stocking density and type of cage. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 9: 549-556.

LIEBERS CJ et al. 2019. The influence of 355 environmental enrichment and stocking density on the plumage and health 356 conditions of laying hen pullets. Poult Sci J 98: 2474-2488.

ONBAŞILAR EE & AKSOY FT. 2005. Stress parameters and immune response of layers under different cage floor and density conditions. Livestock Production Science 95: 255-263.

ÖZENTÜRK U & YILDIZ A. 2020. Assessment of egg quality in native and foreign laying hybrids reared in different cage densities. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 22.

ÖZENTÜRK U et al. 2022. Assessment of the feather score and health score in laying hens reared at different cage densities. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi.

PEGORINI CS et al. 2022. Efeito da Densidade de Alojamento na Produção e Bem-Estar de Poedeiras Comerciais. In: Seminário de Iniciação Científica e Tecnológica da UTFPR. XIV Seminário de Iniciação Científica e Tecnológica da UTFPR.

REIS TL et al. 2019. Influência do sistema de criação em piso sobre cama e gaiola sobre as características ósseas e a qualidade físico-química e microbiológica de ovos de galinhas. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 71: 1623-1630.

ROSTAGNO HS et al. 2017. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: Composição dos alimentos e exigências nutricionais. Viçosa: UFV. p. 483.

ROY P et al. 2020. Welfare and performance of commercial laying hens in conventional California cages at different stocking densities. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90.9

RUSSO JC. 2019. Tudo que você precisa saber sobre os sistemas de produção de ovos. Avicultura industrial. Disponível em: https://www. aviculturaindustrial.com.br/imprensa/tudoque-voce-precisa-saber-sobre-os-sistemasde-producao-de-ovos/20190326-113131-t740 Acesso em: 30 jan. 2019.

ŞAHIN S et al. 2007. Effect of cage density on performance and egg quality traits of layers. Journal of applied research 31: 37-39.

SAKI AA et al. 2012. The effect of cage density on laying hen performance, egg quality, and excreta minerals. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21(3): 467-475.

STADELMAN WJ & COTTERILL OJ. 1995. Egg science and technology. New York/London: Food Products Press, 323p.

TACTACAN GB et al. 2009. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages, Poultry Science 88: 698-707.

TOK S et al. 2022. Effect of age, stocking density, genotype, and cage tier on feather score of layer pure lines, Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 46: 14

UBA. 2008. UNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE AVICULTURA. Protocolo de Bem-Estar para Aves Poedeiras. Disponível em: https://abpa-br.org/tecnico/page/2/> Acesso em: 24/04/2022

YANAI T et al. 2018. Effect of stocking density on productive performance, behaviour, and histopathology of the lymphoid organs in broiler chickens Europ. Poult. Sci. 82

ZHANG M et al. 2018. Effects of stocking density on growth performance, immune organs indexes and serum antioxidant capacity of Dawu Jinfeng commercial layer chicks China Poult 40: 37-41



How to Cite

FARINHAS, Mateus Vianna Santos; QUINTERO, Juan Carlos Palomino; MOREIRA, Yuri Rodrigues; ROCHA, Samuel de Sousa; REIS, Túlio Leite; CURVELLO, Fernando Augusto. Different housing densities of laying hens in cages and their production, egg quality and feather score. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 22, n. 3, p. 463–469, 2023. DOI: 10.5965/223811712232023463. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/23458. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2024.



Research Article - Science of Animals and Derived Products

Most read articles by the same author(s)