Alternative sources of nitrogen for intensification of Zuri guineagrass production

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712122022107

Keywords:

Megathyrsus maximum, nitrogen, protein, organic manure

Abstract

The intensification of pasture production in Brazil is highly dependent on nitrogen fertilization. The aim was to evaluate the productivity of Zuri guineagrass in the management of successive cuts when submitted to intercropping with forage legumes and incorporation of organic residues in replacement of fertilization with urea. In four replication, a randomized complete block design was used, with six nitrogen sources (urea; cattle manure; chicken litter; forage radish; forage peanut; calopogonion and perennial soybean). The residues and urea were applied at the beginning of the experiment and the sowing of forage legumes was carried out on the same day as the grass. Three cuts were made in the grass when it reached 90 cm in height. The following parameters were evaluated: height, relative chlorophyll index, fresh and dry aboveground biomass, nitrogen concentration, protein percentage, and in the third cut, the number of tillers and tillering. It was also observed that there was a better guineagrass production, expressed by fresh and dry biomass indices, as well as with high production, regardless of the treatment used. It is possible to obtain a high growth rate and development of Zuri guineagrass, expressed by tillering and dry biomass production, with N supply using any of the nitrogen sources used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABREU MJI et al. 2020. Morfogênese, características estruturais e acúmulo de forragem do Megathyrsus maximus BRS Zuri submetido a adubação nitrogenada. Boletim de Indústria Animal 77: 1-17.

BHANDARI KB et al. 2018. Soil health indicators as affected by diverse forage species and mixtures in semi-arid pastures. Applied Soil Ecology 132: 179-186.

CAO Y et al. 2020. Enhanced nitrogen retention by lignite during poultry litter composting. Journal of Cleaner Production 277: 122422.

CARVALHO LR et al. 2019. Nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in forage peanut (Arachis pintoi) cv. Belmonte subjected to grazing regimes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 278: 96-106.

CARVALHO WTV et al. 2017. Pastagens degradadas e técnicas de recuperação: Revisão. Pubvet 11: 1036-1045.

COSTA NDL et al. 2019. Resposta de pastagens de Megathyrsus maximus cv. Zuri à frequência de desfolhação. Research, Society and Development 8: 1-14.

CRUZ NT et al. 2021. Fatores que afetam as características morfogênicas e estruturais de plantas forrageiras. Research, Society and Development 10: e5410716180.

EMBRAPA. 2013. EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Brasília: Embrapa. 353p.

FERREIRA DF. 2019. SISVAR: A computer analysis system to fixed effects split plot type designs. Revista Brasileira de Biometria 37: 529-535.

GOMES LSP et al. 2018. Níveis de substituição de ureia por esterco bovino na adubação do capim-marandu. Revista de Ciências Agrárias 41: 914-923.

KOHMANN MM et al. 2018. Nitrogen fertilization and proportion of legume affect litter decomposition and nutrient return in grass pastures. Crop Science 58: 1-11.

LANA RMQ et al. 2010. Alterações na produtividade e composição nutricional de uma pastagem após segundo ano de aplicação de diferentes doses de cama de frango. Bioscience Journal 26: 249-256.

MACÊDO AJS et al. 2018. Adubação orgânica em pastagens tropicais: Revisão. Redvet 19: 1-19.

MAHMUD K et al. 2021. Nitrogen losses and potential mitigation strategies for sustainable agroecosystem. Sustainability 13: 1-23.

MIA S et al. 2018. Enhanced biological nitrogen fixation and competitive advantage of legumes in mixed pastures diminish with biochar aging. Plant Soil 424: 639-651.

MONTEIRO FA. 2013. Uso de corretivos agrícolas e fertilizantes. In: REIS RA et al. 2013 (Ed.). Forragicultura: ciência, tecnologia e gestão de recursos forrageiros. Jaboticabal: Maria Lourdes Brandel - ME. 714p.

PACIULLO DSC & GOMIDE CAM. 2016. As contribuições de Brachiaria e Panicum para a pecuária leiteira. In: JUNTOLLI FVA. Pecuária de leite no Brasil: cenários e avanços tecnológicos. Brasília: Embrapa. p.167-186.

SARRUGE JR & HAAG HP. 1974. Análises químicas em plantas. Piracicaba: ESALQ. 56p.

SOUZA BAA & BITTAR DY. 2021. Efeito do nitrogênio nas características estruturais e produção de biomassa em forrageiras do gênero Panicum. Ipê Agronomic Journal 5: 1-8.

SOUZA DMG & LOBATO E. 2004. Cerrado: correção do solo e adubação. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica. 416p.

TERRA ABC et al. 2019. Leguminosas forrageiras na recuperação de pastagens no Brasil. Revista de Ciências Agrárias 42: 305-313.

VALOTE PD et al. 2021. Forage mass and canopy structure of Zuri and Quênia guineagrass pasture under rotational stocking. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 50: e20200225.

Published

2022-03-25

How to Cite

GONÇALVES, Janine Mesquita; PERON, Hugo Jayme Mathias Coelho; COSTA, Luis Carlos Dias. Alternative sources of nitrogen for intensification of Zuri guineagrass production. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 21, n. 2, p. 107–113, 2022. DOI: 10.5965/223811712122022107. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/21146. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products