Leaching potential and soybean responses to pre-sowing application of different sources of boron

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712442025767

Keywords:

grain yield., perdas de boro, nutrição de boro, glicina máxima, micronutrientes

Abstract

In southern Brazil, the high annual rainfall and soil pH conditions increase the potential for boron (B) leaching. This study aimed to examine B dynamics in soil and the responses of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) crops to surface application of B sources with different solubilities on two clay soils in southern Brazil. The following B sources were used: boric acid (17% B), ulexite (10% B), and disodium octaborate (21% B). Two experiments were conducted, one in soil columns and the other in the field. B leaching along soil columns under simulated edaphoclimatic conditions was not influenced by B source at the tested rate (1.1 kg ha−1 B). The three sources were effective in raising B content in the 0.00–0.20 m layer. On average, 60% of the added B remained in the soil following percolation with distilled water. In the field experiment, plots treated with ulexite or disodium octaborate at a rate of 1 kg ha−1 B had higher soybean yield than the untreated control. The results indicate that other factors besides solubility can influence the effectiveness of pre-sowing application of sources of B to improve soybean nutrition and yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABAT M et al. 2015. Responses of Canola to the Application of Slow-Release Boron Fertilizers and Their Residual Effect. Soil Science Society of America Journal 79: 97–103.

BAMBERG A et al. 2012. Uso de colunas de lixiviação para a determinação da dinâmica de liberação de nutrientes a partir de rochas moídas. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado.

BARROW NJ & HARTEMINK AE. 2023. The effects of pH on nutrient availability depend on both soils and plants. Plant and Soil 487: 21–37.

BATES D et al. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1-48.

BOLAN S et al. 2023. Boron contamination and its risk management in terrestrial and aquatic environmental settings. Science of The Total Environment 894: 164744.

DAMETO LS et al. 2023. Effects of boron sources and rates on grain yield, yield components, nutritional status, and changes in the soil chemical attributes of soybean. Journal of Plant Nutrition 46: 2077-2088.

DAS R et al. 2019. Boron availability in soils and its nutrition of crops under long-term fertility experiments in India. Geoderma 351: 116–129.

DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMIA RURAL. 2020. Prognóstico Cultura SOJA - Dezembro de 2020. Paraná: Secretaria a Agricultura e do Abastecimento. 5p.

FEHR W & CAVINESS C. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Stages of Soybean Development. Disponível em: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/entities/publication/58c89bfe-844d-42b6-8b6c-2c6082595ba3. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2025.

FOX J & WEISBERG S. 2018. An R companion to applied regression. 3.ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

FUJIYAMA BS et al. 2019. Boron fertilization enhances photosynthesis and water use efficiency in soybean at vegetative growth stage. Journal of Plant Nutrition 42: 2498–2506.

GALERIANI TM et al. 2022. Calcium and Boron Fertilization Improves Soybean Photosynthetic Efficiency and Grain Yield. Plants 11: 2937.

HOTHORN T et al. 2008. Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models. Biometrical Journal 50: 346–363.

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE METEOROLOGIA. 2020. Banco de Dados Meteorológicos do INMET.

KÖPPEN W. 2011. The thermal zones of the Earth according to the duration of hot, moderate and cold periods and to the impact of heat on the organic world. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 20: 351–360.

LIBÓRIO IF et al. 2024. Boron Fertilization Improves the Agronomic Performance of Soybean Genotypes in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agriculture 14: 27.

MALAVOLTA E et al. 1997. Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas: princípios e aplicações. Piracicaba: POTAFOS.

MARANGONI FF et al. 2019. Soluble Sources of Zinc and Boron on Sugarcane Yield in Southeast Brazil. Sugar Tech 21: 917–924.

MORAES MT et al. 2020. Soil compaction impacts soybean root growth in an Oxisol from subtropical Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research 200: 104611.

NOVAIS RF et al. 2007. Fertilidade do Solo. Viçosa: SBCS. 909p.

OLIVEIRA JUNIOR A et al. 2020. Fertilidade do solo e avaliação do estado nutricional da soja. In: SEIXAS CDS et al. (Org.). Tecnologias de produção de soja. Londrina: Embrapa Soja. p.133–184.

OLIVEIRA NETO W et al. 2009. Boron extraction and vertical mobility in Paraná State oxisol, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 33: 1259–1267.

PAULETTI V et al. 2019. Manual de adubação e calagem para o Estado do Paraná. Curitiba: SBCS.

PAWLOWSKI ML et al. 2019. Boron and zinc deficiencies and toxicities and their interactions with other nutrients in soybean roots, leaves, and seeds. Journal of Plant Nutrition 42: 634–649.

PEIXOTO DS et al. 2020. Occasional tillage in no-tillage systems: A global meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment 745: 140887.

R CORE TEAM. 2024. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Disponível em: https://www.R-project.org/. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2025.

ROSOLEM CA & BÍSCARO T et al. 2007. Adsorção e lixiviação de boro em Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 42: 1473–1478.

ROSS JR et al. 2006. Boron Fertilization Influences on Soybean Yield and Leaf and Seed Boron Concentrations. Agronomy Journal 98: 198–205.

SÁ & ERNANI. 2016. Boron Leaching Decreases with Increases on Soil pH. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 40: e0150008.

SARKAR D et al. 2015. Liming Effects on Extractable Boron in Six Acidic Soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 46: 1320–1325.

SARKIS LF et al. 2024. Soil organic matter influences the agronomic efficiency of boron fertilizers in sandy Oxisol cultivated with soybean. Scientia Agricola 81: e20230231.

SEIXAS CDS et al. 2020. Tecnologias de produção de soja. Londrina: Embrapa Soja. 347p.

SILVA FC. 2009. Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica e Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos.

SUTRADHAR AK et al. 2017. Soybean Response to Broadcast Application of Boron, Chlorine, Manganese, and Zinc. Agronomy Journal 109:1048–1059.

WILL S et al. 2011. Absorption and mobility of foliar-applied boron in soybean as affected by plant boron status and application as a polyol complex. Plant and Soil 344: 283–293.

Downloads

Published

12-12-2025

How to Cite

BRIGNOLI, Fernando Marcos; VORONIAK, Juliana Marques; SUGUIURA, Lucas Hiroshi; FREITAS, Paulo Sérgio Lourenço de; JUNIOR, João Henrique Vieira de Almeida; INOUE, Tadeu Takeyoshi; BATISTA, Marcelo Augusto. Leaching potential and soybean responses to pre-sowing application of different sources of boron. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 24, n. 4, p. 767–793, 2025. DOI: 10.5965/223811712442025767. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/26711. Acesso em: 19 dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products

Most read articles by the same author(s)