Minimum distance from the soybean sowing line in intercropping with coffee trees in formation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712442025878

Keywords:

Coffea arabica L, development, intercropping

Abstract

The definition of the minimum distance between the soybean sowing line and the orthotropic branch in intercropping with the coffee tree in formation guided the objectives of this research. The experiment was conducted in the demonstration area of the Federal University of Uberlândia, Monte Carmelo Campus, Minas Gerais. The coffee trees were planted in March 2021, with a spacing of 3.5 m between rows and 0.6 m between plants, using the IPR 100 cultivar. Soybeans were planted between coffee tree rows in November 2021, cultivar LG 60162IPRO, with a spacing of 0.4 m between rows and 14 seeds per linear meter. Only the coffee trees were irrigated using a drip system, with spacing between drippers of 0.6 m and a flow rate of 2.1 L h-1. The intercropping configured five management methods with soybean planting rows and distance from the last row to the orthotropic stem: T1: control without soybeans, T2: 2 rows - 1.55 m, T3: 4 rows - 1.15 m, T4: 6 rows - 0.75 m, and T5: 8 rows - 0.35 m from the coffee tree. Each plot consisted of five coffee plants. The following were evaluated in the coffee trees of the three central plants: length, width, and thickness of two leaves per plant, chlorophyll index (SPAD 502), leaf temperature, stomatal count, length of a pair of plagiotropic branches located in the middle third of the coffee tree, number and distance of internodes, and number of primary plagiotropic branches. Soybeans planted between coffee trees did not alter the development pattern of the leaves and branches of Coffea arabica L. when kept at distances greater than 0.75 m from the coffee tree stem. It is suggested that this is the minimum critical tolerance distance for coffee trees without them developing mechanisms to avoid shading and altering their growth pattern.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRAVIN NP et al. 2020. Crescimento inicial do cafeeiro robusta submetido a consórcios culturais nas entrelinhas. Revista Agrarian 13: 169-177.

CARVALHO AMX et al. 2020. SPEED Stat: a free, intuitive, and minimalist spreadsheet program for statistical analyses of experiments. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 20: e327420312.

CARVALHO E et al. 2024. Intercropped Soybean Plant Population in a Coffee Plantation and Its Effects on Agronomic Parameters and Geospatial Information. Agronomy 14: 343.

CHERUBIN MR et al. 2022. Guia prático de plantas de cobertura: aspectos fitotécnicos e impactos sobre a saúde do solo. Piracicaba: ESALQ-USP. 126p.

CONAB. 2023. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de café. Brasília: CONAB. 49p. (4°Levantamento). Disponível em: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/cafe/boletim-da-safra-de-cafe. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2024.

CRAVEN D et al. 2011. Seasonal variability of photosynthetic characteristics influences growth of eight tropical tree species at two sites with contrasting precipitation in Panama. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 1643-1653.

GOMES IAC et al. 2008. Alterações morfofisiológicas em folhas de Coffea arabica L. cv. "Oeiras" sob influência do sombreamento por Acacia mangium Willd. Ciência Rural 38: 109-115.

GUIMARÃES PTG et al. 1999. Recomendações para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais - 5ª Aproximação. Viçosa: Comissão de Fertilidade do Solo do Estado de Minas Gerais. 359p.

LARCHER W. 2006. Ecofisiologia Vegetal. 3.ed. São Carlos: RiMa. 531p.

MAPA. 2024. Secretaria de Política Agrícola. Sumário executivo do café. Outubro de 2024. Disponível em http://www.consorciopesquisacafe.com.br/images/stories/ noticias/2021/2024/Outubro/Sumario_Cafe_outubro_2024.pdf. Acesso em 21 nov. 2024.

MARCHI S et al. 2008. Variation in mesophyll anatomy and photosynthetic capacity during leaf development in a deciduous mesophyte fruit tree (Prunus persica) and an evergreen sclerophyllous Mediterranean shrub (Olea europaea). Trees 22: 559-571.

NASCIMENTO EA et al. 2006. Alterações morfofisiológicas em folhas de cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.) consorciado com seringueira (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). Ciência Rural 36: 852-857.

PELLEGRINA HS. 2022. Trade, productivity, and the spatial organization of agriculture: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Development Economics 156: 102816.

PEREIRA LS et al. 2020. Manejo de plantas daninhas e rendimento de feijão-caupi utilizando plantas de cobertura do solo. Brazilian Journal of Development 6: 2304423059.

PINHO LGR et al. 2021. Mudanças climáticas e a produção de café conilon na microrregião Centro-Oeste do estado do Espírito Santo. Revista Ifes Ciência 7: 01-14.

REZENDE PM et al. 2000. Consórcio soja-café I. Comportamento de cultivares e do número de linhas de soja [Glycine max (L). Merril] sobre o cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.) em sistema de consórcio. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 24: 38.

SANTOS HG et al. 2018. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5.ed. Brasília: EMBRAPA. 355p.

SILVA AR et al. 2015. Desenvolvimento da soja em sistemas de integração lavoura pecuária-floresta. Enciclopédia Biosfera 11: 1-896.

SILVA MA et al. 2021. Plantas de cobertura isoladas e em mix para a melhoria da qualidade do solo e das culturas comerciais no Cerrado. Research, Society and Development 10: 1-11.

SILVA MS & BARDIVIESSO EM. 2021. Soja + café: Integração de alto valor. Campos e Negócios Online. Disponível em: https://revistacampoenegocios.com.br/soja-cafe-integracao-de-alto-valor/. Acesso em: 4. dez. 2024.

TREVISAN E et al. 2012. Distância de internódios, crescimento acumulado e número de nós do café conilon sombreado com seringueira e a pleno sol. In: Anais do 38º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisas Cafeeiras. Resumos....Caxambu: Fundação Procafé.

ZACARIAS AJ et al. 2020. Custo/benefício da adubação verde do consórcio no café conilon. Research, Society and Development 9: 2849119746.

Downloads

Published

12-12-2025

How to Cite

SOUZA, Neidiele Martins de; SILVA, Jordhanna Marilia; SIMÃO, Edson; NAKAMURA, Adriana Tiemi; QUERINO, Gabriel Rodrigues; LOURES, Sanddy Caroline Sena; FELTRE, Virgílio Carrara; ASSIS, Gleice Aparecida; CARVALHO, Eberton de. Minimum distance from the soybean sowing line in intercropping with coffee trees in formation. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 24, n. 4, p. 878–889, 2025. DOI: 10.5965/223811712442025878. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/25488. Acesso em: 19 dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products

Most read articles by the same author(s)