BOVINE OOCYTE VITRIFICATION WITH GLASS MICROPIPETES OR OPEN PULLED STRAW

Authors

  • Alceu Mezzalira
  • Arnaldo Diniz Vieira
  • Fabiano Buss Cruz
  • Dilmar Paulo Barbieri
  • Juliana Cardoso Damiani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811710122002108

Keywords:

vitrification, OPS, bovine oocytes, micropipetes

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of different embryo containers in vitrification procedure, oocytes obtained from 2 to 8mm size follicles were randomly allocated in three groups and submitted to maturation in TCM 199 Earle salts medium with 10% of estrus mare serum (SEE), at 39C, with 5% CO2 atmosphere and 95% of relative humidity. After 22 hours of culture, two groups were submitted to a partial remove of cumulus cells by successive pipeting in a maintenance medium (TCM-Hepes + 10% fetal calf serum) and then exposed to an equilibrium solution with 50l of EG and 50l of DMSO in 400l of maintenance medium, for 30 seconds. After that, they were transferred to a vitrification solution composed by 300l of 0.8M sucrose solution in TCM-Hepes with 20% of fetal calf serum, added with 100l of EG and 100l of DMSO, and loaded in groups of five, in glass micropipetes (MV-T1) or pulled straws (OPS-T2) and vitrified. The warming was performed by direct immersion of MV or OPS in a 0.3M Sucrose solution in maintenance medium, at 37 - 38ºC, during five minutes. The oocytes were then transferred to a 0.15M sucrose solution (five minutes) and then to a maintenance medium. Then, the oocytes of both groups returned to the maturation medium for an additional two hours culture period. All groups were then submitted to the same fertilization and culture procedures. Fertilization was performed with 1 x 106 spermatozoa/ml, selected by swim- up procedure, and the incubation of oocytes / spermatozoa was performed in 400l of TALP-FERT medium with 30g/ml of heparin, during 18–22 hours. The culture was performed in SOFaaci. The cleavage rate of 55.5%, 54.6% and 78.6% was observed in the treatments MV, OPS and Control, respectively. The blastocyst rate was 10.0 and 7.9% for the MV and OPS treatments, respectively. There was not significant differences between treatments (p>0.05) and both were inferior (p<0.05) to the Control, 42.8%. These results demonstrated that the glass micropipetes could be used in the bovine oocyte vitrification, providing similar results than those obtained with the OPS.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARAV, A.; SHERU, D.; MATTIOLI, M. Osmotic andcytotoxic Study of Vitrification of Immature Bovine Oocytes. J. of Repr. and Fert., v.99, p. 353-358, 1993.

ARAV, A.; ZERON, Y.; LESLIE, S.B.; BEHBOODI, E.; ANDERSON, G.B.; CROWE, J.H. Phase transition temperature and chilling sensitivity of bovine oocytes. Cryobiology, v.33, n.6, p. 589-599, 1996.

FIGUEIRÓ, G.M., BRUM, D.S., MEZZALIRA, A., FIALHO, S.S., ALVES, M.R.L., RUBIN, M.I.B. E SILVA, C.A.M. Soro eqüino na PIV de embriões bovinos: análise do soro de égua em diferentes estágios do cio. Arq. Fac. Vet. UFRGS, v.28, n.1, p.258, 2000 (Supl.).

HOCHI, S.; AKIYAMA, M.; MINAGAWA, G.; KIMURA, K.; HANADA, A. Effects of cooling and warming rates during vitrification on fertilization of in vitro matured bovine oocytes. Cryobiology, v.42, n.1, p.69-73, 2001

HOLM, P.; BOOTH, P. J.; SCHMIDT, M. H.; GREVE, T.; CALLESEN, H. High bovine blastocyst development in a static in vitri production system using SOFaa Medium supplemented with Sodium Citrate and Myo-Inositol with or without serum-proteins. Theriogenology, v.52, p.683- 700, 1999.

HURT, A.E.; SQUIRES, E.L.; SEIDEL, G.E.Jr. Vitrification of equine and bovine oocytes in na ethylene glycol, ficoll and sucrose using open pulled straws. Theriogenology, v.51. n.1, p.166, 1999. Abstract.

Le GAL, F.; MASSIP, A. Development of thawed oocytes fertilized in vitro after vitrification by the Open Pulled Straw method before or after in vitro maturation. In: Gametes: Development and Function, Lauria, A; Gandolfi, F. Editors, Milano,1998, p.554.

LIM, J.M.; FUKUI, Y.; ONO, H. The post-thaw developmental capacity of frozen bovine oocytes following in vitro maturation and fertilization. Theriogenology, v.35, n.6, p.1225-1235, 1991.

LIM, J.M.; FUKUI, Y.; ONO, H. Developmental competence of bovine oocytes frozen at various maturation stages followed by in vitro maturation and fertilization. Theriogenology, v.37, n.2, p.351-361, 1992.

MARTINO, A.; POLLARD J.W.; LEIBO, S.P. Effect of chilling bovine oocytes on their developmental competence. Mol. Reprod. Dev., v.45, p.503-512, 1996.

MEZZALIRA, A; BARBIERI, D. P.; MULLER, F.; PINHO, C. C.; SILVA, C.A.M.; RUBIN, M.I.B.; BERNARDI, M.L. Vitrificação de oócitos bovinos em micropipetas de vidro. Arq.Fac.Vet. UFRGS, v.27, n.1, p.262, 1999.

MEZZALIRA, A.; VIEIRA, A.D.; BARBIERI, D.P.; MACHADO, M.F.; THALER NETO, A.; BERNARDI, M.L.; MONDINO, C.A.; RUBIN, M.I.B. Vitrificação de oócitos e embriões bovinos produzidos in vitro e expostos a citocalasina B. Brazilian Veter. Journal, (aceito p/public), 2002

PALASZ, T.A. & DEL CAMPO, M. Cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes and embryos: Recent advances. In: SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL DE TRANSFERENCIA DE EMBRIONES- BIOTECNOLOGIA E TECNOLOGIAS AVANZADAS,...Anais.. Montevideo, 4- 5 maio 1995, p.78-85, 1995.

RALL, W. F., & FAHY, G. M. Ice-free criopreservation of mouse embryos at –196ºC by vitrification. Letters to Nature, v.313, p.573-575, 1985.

VAJTA, G; BOOTH, P.J.; HOLM, P.; GREVE, T.; CALLESEN, H. Successful vitrification of early stage bovine in vitro produced embryos with the oppen pulled straw (OPS) method. Cryo Letters, v.18, p.191-195, 1997.

VAJTA, G.; KUWAYAMA, M.; BOOTH, P.J.; HOLM, P.; GREVE, T.; CALLESEN, H. Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification of cattle oocytes. Theriogenology, v.49, n.1, p.176, 1998. Abstract.

Published

2002-10-15

How to Cite

MEZZALIRA, Alceu; VIEIRA, Arnaldo Diniz; CRUZ, Fabiano Buss; BARBIERI, Dilmar Paulo; DAMIANI, Juliana Cardoso. BOVINE OOCYTE VITRIFICATION WITH GLASS MICROPIPETES OR OPEN PULLED STRAW. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 1, n. 2, p. 108–114, 2002. DOI: 10.5965/223811710122002108. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/23924. Acesso em: 26 may. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Animals and Derived Products

Most read articles by the same author(s)