Characterization of bovine milk production systems in a municipality in the Brazilian semiarid region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712222023312Keywords:
development, livestock, management, public policiesAbstract
The realization of diagnoses of agricultural activities becomes essential, especially in those municipalities that depend on the sector to enrich the GDP and generate employment and income, since this collected information directs efficient public policies. The objective was to investigate how the bovine milk production systems in the municipality of Quixeramobim/CE are organized and distributed. A survey was carried out by applying a questionnaire to ranchers during the foot-and-mouth disease vaccination campaign, having quantified some variables, such as: milk production (L/day), total cows (head), lactating cows (head), property area (ha), geographic location in the municipality and some zootechnical indices derived from the relationship of the matrices with the volume of milk produced. It was observed that Quixeramobim produces approximately 151,602 L/day of milk, with a total of 15,694 milked cows (head, with the districts of Damião Carneiro and Encantado being the highest (29,538 L/day) and lowest (5,629 L/day) volumes produced, respectively. It was also noted that the districts of Nenelândia and Encantado were the ones that presented the highest (17%) and lowest (3%) numbers of producers in relation to the total, respectively, of the municipality, and most of them, according to the condition of land use, are owners (43%), and a small part (4%) are considered residents. Quixeramobim has dairy cattle as one of its main activities, which has been characterized by high variability throughout its territory, which is indicative at the time of generation and application of specific public policies, taking into account the specificities of each location.
Downloads
References
AGUIAR SC et al. 2020. Sustentabilidade da pecuária leiteira do semiárido brasileiro com base em vulnerabilidade e resiliência sociológica. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciências Ambientais 2: 236-248.
ALMEIDA NETO LA et al. 2014. Climatização na pré-ordenha de vacas girolando no inverno do semiárido. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 18: 1072-1078.
ANDRADE EM et al. 2020. Ecohydrology in Brazilian tropical dry forest: thinned vegetation impacto on hidrological functions and ecosystem servisse. Journal of Hydrology: regional studies 27: 100-649.
BASSO D & GEHLEN I. 2015. Agricultores familiares modernos e diversos. Revista Orbis Latina 2: 1-17.
BIKKER JP et al. 2014. Technical note: Evaluation of an ear-attached movement sensor to record cow feeding behavior and activity. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 2974–2979.
CAMPOS AT & FERREIRA AM. 2001. Composição do rebanho e sua importância no manejo. Embrapa Gado de Leite. 2p. Disponível em: http://guernsey.cnpgl.embrapa.br/sites/default/files/32Instrucao.pdf. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2022.
CONRADO JAA et al. 2019. O manejo da pastagem natural incrementa a biomassa herbácea nativa e exótica e a biodiversidade na Caatinga no Brasil. Revista Semina, 40: 867-884.
DERESZ F. 2001. Produção de leite de vacas mestiças Holandês x Zebu em Pastagem de capim-elefante, manejada em sistemas rotativo com e sem suplementação durante a época das chuvas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 30: 197-204.
FAO. 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Roma: FAO STAT.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. 2012. FAPRI-ISU World Agricultural Outlook 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/outlook/2011/>. Acesso em: 02 ago. 2022.
IBGE. 2021. Disponível em <https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/>, Acesso em: 18 ago. 2022.
IPCE. 2011. Perfil básico municipal. Disponível em < https://www.ipece.ce.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2018/09/Quixeramobim_2011.pdf>. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2022.
KORNBROT D. 2000. Statistical software for microcomputers: SigmaPlot 2000 and SigmaStat2. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 53: 335-337.
LAZARIN AR & MAZZUCATTO BC. 2017. Diagnóstico de bem-estar em bovinocultura de leite. Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública 4: 137.
LIMA PO et al. 2009. Perfil dos produtores rurais do município de Quixeramobim no Estado do Ceará. Revista Caatinga 22: 255-259.
MENDONÇA MMM. 2014. Avaliação econômica da produção de leite no Ceará: Estudo de casos em Quixeramobim. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (Bacharel em Ciências Econômicas). 65p. Disponível em:< https://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/33275>. Acesso em: 02 ago. 2022.
MINAYO MCS. 2017. Amostragem e saturação da pesquisa qualitativa: consenso e controvérsias. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa 5: 1-12.
RESENDE JC et al. 2016. Ganho tecnológico na cadeia produtiva do leite. Agroanalysis 31: 17-18.
SANTOS GRA et al. 2014. Caracterização da caprinocultura na bacia leiteira sergipana. Scientia Plena 10: 1-12.
SILVA CP et al. 2018. Glomlin-related soil protein content in areas of degraded and revegetated Caatinga in the municipality of Irauçuba. Journal of Agriculture Science 10: 302-312.
SILVA NETO OL & MARQUESAN FFS. 2020. As racionalidades que permeiam a bovinocultura de leite no semiárido cearense 13: 1303-1321.
VILELA D et al. 2017. A evolução do leite no Brasil em cinco décadas. Revista de Política Agrícola 26: 5-24.
VILHENA LG. 2012. Tecnologia e rentabilidade: O caso dos produtores de leite da cooperativa (QUILEITE) do município de Quixeramobim, Ceará. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia Rural). 114p.
WENZ JR. 2018. Optimization of clinical mastitis records on dairies. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 34: 493–505.
WOOLPERT ME et al. 2016. Management, nutrition, and lactation performance are related to bulk tank milk de novo fatty acid concentration on Northeastern US dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 10: 8486–8497.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors & Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.