Growth performance and health of lactating lambs consuming milk replacers with different proportions of lactose

Authors

  • Marcelo Vedovatto Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.
  • Luis Henrique Ebling Farinatti Universidade Federal do Acre, Cruzeiro do Sul, AC, Brasil.
  • Cristiano Todero Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711832019339

Keywords:

artificial milk, suckling, Lacaune, sheep

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate growth performance, feed intake and health by suckling Lacaune lambs consuming ewe's milk or milk replacers with different lactose (LAC) ratios. Thirty-six male lambs with approximately six days of age (4,98 ± 1,20 kg) were used, and evaluated until weaning (60 days of age). These were divided in 12 cohorts, with three animals each, and housed in pens, corresponding to four pens per treatment. The experimental treatments were: Ewe's milk; Milk replacer 36% LAC, milk replacer containing 36% of lactose and; Milk replacer 29% LAC, milk replacer containing 29% of lactose. The lambs fed with Milk replacer 29% LAC showed lower (p≤0.05) final body weight, average daily gain, total feed intake and worse feed conversion, in relation to the animals treated with Ewe’s milk. The lambs that received Milk replacer 36% LAC did not differ (p>0.05) from the animals treated with Ewe’s milk and Milk replacer 29% LAC for the variables mentioned above. There was no treatment effect (p>0.05) on the mortality or diarrhea rate. Thus, Milk replacer 36% LAC can replace the Ewe's milk without impairing growth performance, intake and health of lambs, but the use of the Milk replacer 29% LAC, despite not having affected the health, can reduce the growth performance and feed intake in lambs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 15.ed. Arlington: AOAC International. 1117p.

EMSEN E et al. 2004. Growth performance of Awassi lambs fed calf milk replacer. Small Ruminant Research 53: 99-102.

HERNÁNDEZ-CASTELLANO LE et al. 2015. The effect of milk source on body weight and immune status of lambs. Livestock Science 175: 70-76.

HUNTINGTON JA & GIVENS DI. 1995. The in situ technique for studying the rumen degradation of feeds: A review of the procedure. Nutrition Abstract and Reviews 65: 63-93.

LANZA M et al. 2006. Lamb meat quality as affected by a natural or artificial milk feeding regime. Meat Science 73: 313-318.

SAS. 2013. Statistical Analysis System, versão 9.4. North Carolina: SAS Institute Incorporated.

NAPOLITANO F & ROSA G. 2008. Welfare implications of artificial rearing and early weaning in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110: 58-72.

NRC. 2007. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. 7.ed. Washington: National Academic Press. 384p.

OCAK S & CANKAYA S. 2013. A novel method of analyzing rearing system on lamb growth and farm profitability. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 495-499.

OSWALD IP et al. 1990. Classical and alternative pathway hemolytic activities of ovine complement: variations with age and sex. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 24: 259-266.

SNIFFEN CJ et al. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3562-3577.

UMBERGER HS. 1997. Profitable artificial rearing of lambs. Animal and Poultry Science, Publication Nº. 410-023. Virginia Cooperative Extension.

VAN SOEST PJ et al. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597.

Published

2019-07-30

How to Cite

VEDOVATTO, Marcelo; FARINATTI, Luis Henrique Ebling; TODERO, Cristiano. Growth performance and health of lactating lambs consuming milk replacers with different proportions of lactose. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 18, n. 3, p. 339–345, 2019. DOI: 10.5965/223811711832019339. Disponível em: https://revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/13300. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Animals and Derived Products