The World Bank’s Assistance Strategies for Brazil from a political perspective (1990-2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/2175180314372022e0301Keywords:
fiscal austerity, economic liberalization, structural adjustment, state reform, the World BankAbstract
This article analyzes the World Bank’s assistance strategies for Brazil in the period from 1990 to 2020, in order to evidence the strategic importance attributed to fiscal austerity and neoliberal reforms, evaluate how the “assault on poverty” was used as rhetoric and a legitimation mechanism for the neoliberal agenda, problematize the World Bank’s relationship with the private sector and civil society organizations which are "partners" of the institution and, finally, discuss the decisive importance of the Bank’s advisory and consultancy services in the country. Assistance strategies constitute the most important documentation in the World Bank’s relations with Brazil. The analysis focuses on the periods from 1990 to 2002 (the Collor, Itamar and FHC administrations), from 2003 to 2016 (the Lula and Dilma administrations) and from 2016 to 2020 (the Temer and Bolsonaro administrations). The paper shows that the modus operandi of the World Bank combined funding with advisory services, technical assistance, and economic research, in order to disseminate advice and practices related to what governments should do and how they should do this in public policy questions. It is argued that Brazil’s relations with the World Bank were more programmatic or more pragmatic depending on the government, but always involved the choices of national agents over the directions to follow and how to do this in the question of development. It is evidenced that for thirty years the fiscal adjustment assumed a normative primacy in the Bank’s agenda, in the sense of preceding and framing all and any discussion about the directions and means of development.
Downloads
References
BABB, Sarah. Behind the development banks: Washington politics, world poverty, and the wealthy of nations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.
BANCO MUNDIAL. World development report: poverty. Washington, DC: [World Bank], 1990.
BANCO MUNDIAL. World development report: the challenge of development. Washington, DC: [World Bank], 1991.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Country assistance strategy for the Federative Republic of Brazil: report n. 14569-BR. Washington, DC: [World Bank], Jun. 6, 1995.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Relatório sobre o Desenvolvimento Mundial: o Estado num mundo em transformação. Washington, DC: [World Bank], 1997a.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Country assistance strategy of the world bank group for the Federative Republic of Brazil: report n. 16582-BR. Washington, DC: [World Bank], Jun. 12, 1997b.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Country assistance strategy of the world bank group for the Federative Republic of Brazil: report n. 20160-BR. Washington, DC: [World Bank], Mar. 6, 2000.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Estratégia de assistência ao país: Brasil – 2004 a 2007. Washington, DC, [Banco Mundial], 2003.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Brazil: country assistance evaluation. Washington, DC: [Banco Mundial], Report n. 27629-BA, 14 jan. 2004.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Estratégia de parceria com o país: Brasil (2008 a 2011). Washington, DC: [Banco Mundial], Relatório n. 42677-BR, 2008.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Estratégia de parceria com o país: Brasil (2012 a 2015). Washington, DC: [Banco Mundial], Relatório n. 63731-BR, 2011.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Country Partnership Framework for the Federative Republic of Brazil for the Period FY18-FY23. Washington, DC, Report n. 113259-BR, 2017a.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Um ajuste justo: análise da eficiência e equidade do gasto público no Brasil. Brasília [Banco Mundial], 2017b.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Annual report. Washington, DC: [World Bank], 2020a. v. 2.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Covid-19 no Brasil: impactos e respostas de políticas públicas. Brasília: [Banco Mundial], 2020b.
CARROLL, Tom. Delusions of development: the World Bank and the post-Washington consensus in Southeast Asia. London: Palgrave, 2010.
CHANCEL, Lucas et al. World inequality report 2022. Paris: World Inequality Lab, 2022. Disponível em: https://wid.world/document/world-inequality-report-2022/. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2021.
DEZALAY, Yves; GARTH, Bryant. The internationalization of palace wars: lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago: The Chicago University Press, 2002.
ENGEL, Susan. The World Bank and the post-Washington consensus in Vietnam and Indonesia. London: Routledge, 2010.
FINE, Ben. Social capital versus social history. Social History, London, v. 33, n. 4, p. 442-467, 2008.
FINE, Ben. The developmental state is dead: long live social capital? In: MOORE, David (ed.). The World Bank: development, poverty, hegemony. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2007. p. 121-143.
FINE, Ben. The World Bank’s speculation on social capital. In: PINCUS, Jonathan; WINTERS, Jeffrey (eds.). Reinventing the World Bank. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002. p. 203-221.
IBGE. As fundações privadas e associações sem fins lucrativos no Brasil – 2002. Rio de Janeiro: [IBGE], 2004.
GONZALEZ, Manuel et al. O Brasil e o Banco Mundial: um diagnóstico das relações econômicas (1949-1989). Brasília: IPEA, 1990.
GROOTAERT, Christiaan; VAN BASTELAER, Thierry (eds.). Understanding and measuring social capital: a multidisciplinary tool for practitioners. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2002.
HARRISON, Graham. The World Bank and Africa. London: Routledge, 2004.
HARRISS, John. Social capital. In: SUNDARAM, Jomo Kwame; FINE, Ben (eds.). The new development economics after the Washington consensus. London: Zed Books, 2006. p. 184-199.
HARRISS, John. Depoliticizing development: the World Bank and social capital. London: Anthem Press, 2002.
KAMAT, Sangeeta. The privatization of public interest: theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Review of International Political Economy, [London], v. 11, n.1, p. 155-176, 2004.
KAPUR, Devesh; LEWIS, John; WEBB, Richard (eds.). The World Bank: Its first half century: history. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.
MASON, Edward; ASHER, Richard. The World Bank since Bretton Woods. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1973.
MEDEIROS, Marcelo; CASTRO, Fábio. A composição da renda no topo da distribuição: evolução no Brasil entre 2006 e 2012, a partir de informações do Imposto de Renda. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, v. 27, n. 2, p. 577-605, 2018.
NELSON, Paul. The World Bank and nongovernmental organizations: the limits of apolitical development. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 1995.
OSBORNE, David; GAEBLER, Ted. Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Plume, 1992.
OSBORNE, David; PLASTRIK, Peter. La reducción de la burocracia: cinco estrategias para reinventar el gobierno. Barcelona: Paidós, 1998.
PEREIRA, João Márcio Mendes. O Banco Mundial no Brasil (1990-2020). Curitiba: Appris, 2022.
PEREIRA, João Márcio Mendes. Continuidade, ruptura ou reciclagem? uma análise do programa político do Banco Mundial após o Consenso de Washington. Dados, Rio de Janeiro, v. 58, p. 461-498, 2015.
PEREIRA, João Márcio Mendes. O Banco Mundial como ator político, intelectual e financeiro (1944-2008). Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2010.
SOUZA, Pedro H. G. F. Os ricos no Brasil: o que sabemos, o que não sabemos e o que deveríamos saber. Revista Brasileira de Informação Bibliográfica em Ciências Sociais - BIB, São Paulo, v. 85, p. 5-26, 2018.
U.S. TREASURY. Articles of Agreement: United Nations monetary and financial conference - Bretton Woods, NH, July 1 to 22, 1944. Washington, DC: [U.S. Treasury], 1944.
WILLIAMS, David. The World Bank and social transformation in international politics. London: Routledge, 2008.
WOODS, Ngaire. The globalizers: the IMF, the World Bank and their borrowers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tempo e Argumento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The articles published by the magazine are for free use, destined for educational purposes and not commercial. The copyrights are all granted to the magazine. The articles whose authors are identified represent the expressed opinion of its authors and not the official position of the Tempo e Argumento magazine or of the Postgraduate Program in History of the Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina.