Optimizing of tray arrangement for the production of hydroponic green fodder from Avena sativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712412025179Keywords:
Efficient water use, hydroponics, intensive cultivationAbstract
Hydroponic green forage is an alternative from the point of view of nutritional supplement and it is estimated that the water savings in these systems can be significant, saving up to 90% compared to conventional irrigation methods. The objective of this research was to evaluate the arrangement of the trays in a hydroponic green forage production system with water recirculation, to determine the effect on the performance of the oat crop. The test consisted of 80 polyethylene trays; each tray has an area of 0.167 m2. In the evaluated treatments, the water flow was configured in two distinct ways. Nutrient solution (18-18-18) was applied, applying 90 grams in 150 liters of water. In Treatment A, the flow pattern alternates between levels in a zigzag manner: at levels 4 and 2, water flows from the center to the sides, whereas at levels 3 and 1, it flows from the sides to the center, where the excess volume is collected. In Treatment B, the water flow is more uniform: at levels 4, 3, and 2, it is directed from the center to the sides, ensuring an orderly descent, while at level 1, it is channeled from the sides to the center towards the collection point. This configuration simplifies system management and facilitates efficient water drainage. To compare the treatments, the following variables were evaluated: plant height and total dry matter. The arrangement of the tray with water recirculation showed a significant effect on the dry matter yield in the oat crop. The arrangements that favor better performance and greater production of dry matter were the trays with the arrangement towards the outside of the rack.
Downloads
References
ALBERT G et al. 2016. Productive evaluation of hydroponic green forage of maize, oats, and wheat. Compendio de Ciencias Veterinarias 6: 7-10.
BIRGI JA et al. 2018. Hydroponic green forage as a productive alternative in southern patagonia: productivity and nutritional quality of two varieties of barley (Hordeum vulgare). RIA. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias 44: 316-323.
BOUADILA S et al. 2022. Assessing heating and cooling needs of hydroponic sheltered systems in Mediterranean climate: a case study of sustainable fodder production. Energy 261: 125-274.
CELI-SABANDO KD & TORRES-AVELLAN TE. 2023. Production of hydroponic green forage of maize (Zea mays L.) with the application of effective microorganisms. Revista Criterios 30: 43-50.
CISNEROS-SAGUILÁN P et al. 2023. Hydroponic green forage as an alternative forage in animal feeding. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 26: 1-16.
CONDOY MDCC et al. 2023. Impact of hydroponic forage and effective microorganisms on guinea pigs: productive, hematological, and nutritional biochemical parameters. Revista Alfa 7: 573-582.
FAO. 2002. Hydroponic Green Forage. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación. Oficina Regional de la FAO para América latina y el Caribe. Santiago: FAO.
GIRMA F & GEBREMARIAM B. 2018. Review on hydroponic feed value to livestock production. Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research 7: 106-109.
JORDAN RA et al. 2018. Productivity of lettuce cultivated in hydroponic and aquaponic systems using different substrates. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 22: 525-529.
MARTINEZ et al. (2024). Análisis de la actividad del Azotobacter chroococcum en cultivo demaíz hidropónico. Agricolae & Habitat 7: 55-66.
MGAP. 2023. Ministerio de ganadería, agricultura y pesca. Agricultural Statistical Yearbook.
MEJÍA-CASTILLO HJ & NÚÑEZ FSO. 2019. Hydroponic green forage: a production alternative in response to climate change. Rev. Iberoam Bioecon Cambio Clim 5: 1103–1120.
MORALES D et al. 2020. Production of oat and wheat forage under hydroponic and conventional systems. Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 21: 1-16.
NÚÑEZ-TORRES OP & GUERRERO-LÓPEZ JR. 2021. Hydroponic forage: an alternative for domestic animal feeding. Journal of the Selva Andina Animal Science 8: 44-52.
RAMOS E et al. 2021. Hydroponic yield of the association of vetch with oats, barley, and wheat in sprout production. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú 32: 1-12.
VELÁSQUEZ WL et al. 2023. Increase of phytomass and protein in hydroponic green forage through fertilization in Casanare, Colombia. Agro Productividad 16: 129-138
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors & Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.